Michele DiPietro had his listeners in stitches with his impressions of dumb things college students say in class.
Then he sobered them up with advice about how they could do their own jobs better, how to handle such recurring classroom challenges as apathy and short attention spans.
DiPietro's disciples were junior members of the faculty at Kennesaw State University, near Atlanta, where he directs a center to improve the quality of teaching at the school. It's one of a growing number of efforts to address the reality that most college professors never expressly learn how to teach.
"It's no longer enough to get your Ph.D., stand in front of a class, and let the chips fall where they may," said Hoag Holmgren, executive director for the Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education, a national group focusing on teacher training.
The trend is being fueled by demands from parents and policymakers to get more for the money they're investing in higher education, and by the growth of faculty-rating websites and a new body of research about effective teaching. DiPietro is co-author of a book on the topic called "How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching."
Faculty seems to be craving training, too. Only 18 people came to DiPietro's workshop, which is voluntary, the first time he offered it at Kennesaw last year. This summer, 75 did. He taught them techniques, like how to vary their teaching styles, telling them don't just stand in front of a classroom or auditorium and lecture. Show interest in students. Encourage them to discuss the material as much as possible.
Teaching centers like the one at Kennesaw State generally provide services, such as one-on-one consultations aimed at helping professors improve their classroom performance, workshops on how to handle course loads, lessons from the latest research on learning and online guides to using technology in the classroom.
At Carnegie Mellon University's Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence & Educational Innovation, the number of faculty signing up for confidential consultations to improve their teaching has gone from 100 to 180 in less than three years, said director Marsha Lovett.
The University of Michigan's Center for Research on Learning and Teaching _ the nation's oldest such initiative _ conducts 2,800 consultations a year, more than double the number of a decade ago, said interim director Matthew Kaplan. The university also runs "teaching academies" that all new hires in most of its schools are required to take. Some departments hold monthly "How Learning Works" sessions, too, Kaplan said.
"Teaching is a much more important part of the package now," he said. "It's more than just knowing the content."
Doctoral programs in which most faculty prepare for their careers in academia focus almost exclusively on knowledge of the subject they intend to teach, research and write about, according to advocates for better university teaching.
But now, said Holmgren, "There's an increase in accountability, in the measurability of student learning and the effectiveness of teaching."
His association is made up mostly of people like DiPietro, whose jobs are to help faculty improve their classroom skills. There are 1,750 members, and that number has been growing at about 5 percent a year for five years, Holmgren said.
Some wonder why it took so long for higher education to teach its faculty to teach.
"I mean, come on," said Brandon Busteed, executive director for Gallup Education, a branch of the polling agency whose surveys show that nearly four in 10 college graduates say they never had a professor who made them excited about learning.
"It shows a lack of selecting for the right talent, a lack of training," Busteed said. "And it shows what we value and espouse. Institutions of higher education have not valued high-quality teaching."
(c)2014 The Hechinger Report
Distributed by MCT Information Services
