City Hall Corruption Case Delayed
Judge Rules Case Complex
POSTED: 11:41 am PST November 4, 2003
UPDATED: 11:52 am PST November 4, 2003
SAN DIEGO -- A federal judge has delayed the start date of the trial of three councilmen accused of corruption because of the complexity of the case, it was reported Tuesday.
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey T. Miller Monday released his written ruling, which neither prosecutors nor defense attorneys opposed.
The judge based his decision on the unusually high number of defendants, the "massive" amount of documents and recorded conversations that must be reviewed and the complicated nature of the legal issues involved, according to the ruling, which was obtained by The San Diego Union-Tribune.The designation of the case as complex means it no longer falls under the provisions of the Speedy Trial Act, which requires that a trial begin within 70 days from the date an indictment is filed. An indictment on Aug. 28 accuses Cheetahs strip club owner Michael Galardi, club manager John D'Intino and lobbyist Lance Malone of participating in a plan to abolish the no-touch rule at strip clubs by giving thousands of dollars to San Diego City Councilmen Ralph Inzunza, (pictured, far left), Charles Lewis, (pictured, left), and Michael Zucchet, (pictured, middle).Dave Cowan, a council aide, is charged with making a false statement to federal agents.The indictment also said Galardi, D'Intino and Malone paid an undercover San Diego vice detective, who they believed was on the take, for notice of police inspections at Cheetahs in Kearny Mesa.The councilmen and Malone pleaded not guilty. Galardi and D'Intino have pleaded guilty and agreed to testify against the others.In his ruling, the judge said there are approximately 2,000 pages of documents and 3,000 hours of recorded conversations, 10News reported. He also wrote that he anticipated hearing complex legal issues involving wiretaps, confidential informants and motions to suppress evidence and statements.
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey T. Miller Monday released his written ruling, which neither prosecutors nor defense attorneys opposed. Previous Stories:
- October 23, 2003: Councilmen Face 'Complex' Case
- October 21, 2003: Councilmen Claim Government Set Them Up
- September 11, 2003: Judge Appoints City Councilman With Lawyer
- September 5, 2003: City Council Scandal: Plea Bargains In Works?
- September 3, 2003: Strip Club Lobbyist Pleads Not Guilty
- September 2, 2003: Strip Club Employee Admits To Conspiracy
- September 2, 2003: Council Meets For First Time After Indictments
- August 29, 2003: Council Members Plead Not Guilty To Charges
- August 26, 2003: City Hall Investigation: Is It Over Yet?
- August 26, 2003: Strip Club Lobbyist Gets 63 Calls From Council Offices
- August 12, 2003: Campaign Contributions: What's Forbidden?
- July 16, 2003: Strip Club Allegedly Bundles Contributions
- July 11, 2003: Testimony: Contributions Reimbursed With Cash
- July 11, 2003: Employees, Relatives Of Strip Club Owner To Testify
- June 23, 2003: Calendars Reveal Meetings With Strip Club Lobbyist
- June 13, 2003: Current, Former Council Staffers Testify Before Grand Jury
- June 6, 2003: Stevens Testifies Before Grand Jury
- May 30, 2003: City Council Staffers Testify Before Grand Jury
- May 22, 2003: Former Councilman Met With Strip Club Lobbyist
- May 21, 2003: Local Strip Club Tied To Mob?
- May 20, 2003: Were Strippers Tipped-Off About Inspections?
- May 20, 2003: Constituents Comment On City Council Investigation
- May 19, 2003: Councilmen Claim They've Done Nothing Wrong
- May 19, 2003: Grand Jury Resumes City Council Probe
- May 18, 2003: Federal Grand Jury Hears Council Member Testify
- May 16, 2003: Strip Club Warrant Details Revealed
- May 15, 2003: Mayor: Despite Raid, Business Of City Continues
- May 15, 2003: 3 City Council Offices, Strip Club Raided By FBI
Copyright 2004 by 10News.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.




