A San Diego grand jury report made public Tuesday says the city's Citizens Review Board on Police Practices operates in an atmosphere of prejudice, fear and intimidation that impairs the ability of members to render independent and impartial decisions.

» Sign Up For Breaking News Alerts» Like Us On Facebook» Follow Us On Twitter

The CRB is an independent citizens group that evaluates serious complaints brought by the public against San Diego police officers and advocates for policies that promote fair and humane police practices. (Click here to read a PDF of the Citizens Review Board policy on police practices. )

According to Tuesday's grand jury report, the CRB has allowed police with the Internal Affairs Division to attend the board's closed session meetings for several years, contributing to the atmosphere of fear and intimidation. (Click here to read a PDF of the Citizens Review Board press release. )

Members of the IA Division argue, lecture and sometimes bully CRB members into changing their minds, and IA officers have told the CRB that they never want any dissenting votes passed on to the mayor or chief of police, according to the grand jury report.

In addition, CRB leadership is weak and lacks the will to control meetings, including the behavior of CRB members toward one another. This fosters a lack of decorum, according to the report, which noted an atmosphere of fear and intimidation between some CRB member and a high turnover rate among prospective board members.

The process of CRB members interviewing and selecting candidates for prospective board members and recommending them to the mayor for appointment allows bias, prejudice and other personal feelings of the interview committee members to influence the board's recommendations, the grand jury report said.

The grand jury recommends stopping IA officers from attending CRB closed sessions and interfering with the board, both during their file reviews and deliberations.

The grand jury also recommends the mayor appoint a three-member team, independent of the CRB, to investigate and evaluate the current CRB executive leadership to determine if changes are needed.

To stop cronyism and promote ethnic and economic diversity, the grand jury recommends that the mayor establish an interview committee, independent from the CRB, for the selection of prospective board members, and reduce from eight to four years the number of consecutive years a board member can serve.

(Click here to read a statement issued Wednesday, May 23, by the CRB in response to the report. )

The following is a statement from San Diego Chief Operating Officer Jay Goldstone regarding the CRB:

"The CRB is a competent, hard working board with many diverse voices providing impartial oversight of investigations and responses to citizens’ complaints against officers.

Boards can always increase their effectiveness and we are open to feedback and suggestions about ways to enhance the accomplishment of its mission. The CRB is actively addressing some of the concerns already raised: it held a special meeting to discuss decorum and re-opened the pool of prospective members to recruit diverse candidates."

The San Diego City Attorney's Office released this statement regarding the grand jury's findings:

"We appreciate the input and findings from the grand jury. Our office is working on a response to their recommendations and will do so within the required time frame."