City Set To Extend Chargers' 'Trigger' Period
Extension Will Give Chargers Task Force More Time
POSTED: 9:09 am PST January 28, 2003
UPDATED: 11:24 am PST January 28, 2003
SAN DIEGO -- The San Diego City Council will take up an item today related to a possible extension of the so-called trigger provision in the Chargers' contract.The city and the Chargers are essentially unified over extending the 60-day trigger period, during which the team could seek to renegotiate its lease contract. The trigger period was originally scheduled to begin Dec. 1 and end Wednesday. If extended, the period would begin March 1.
At issue today is whether the city should grant the team the right to automatically invoke the trigger in case of a lawsuit challenging the delay.In a City Manager's Report recommending the council approve the agreement, Deputy City Manager Bruce Herring and Assistant City Attorney Les Girard cast the side deal, known as the Saving Agreement, as preserving the status quo as of Wednesday.
"Approval of the Saving Agreement is in the best interests of the city and the task force," Herring and Girard stated.The City Council voted Jan. 13 in favor of delaying the trigger period, but held off until today on the Saving Agreement, which the team is seeking.The Citizens' Task Force on Chargers Issues recommended approving the Saving Agreement, but it expressed the view that the city has every right to challenge whether the team has actually met the trigger specifications.The team has repeatedly asserted that the conditions exist to enable it to exercise the trigger clause, which is based on NFL salary restrictions.The Chargers have 60 days to notify the city if the team believes it has met the trigger threshold for this season, although that is the deadline for which the extension is being explored.Official notice that the trigger has been met would start a 90-day negotiation period with the city of San Diego, followed by a 180-day period when the Chargers could seek a deal in another town.San Diego would have 90 days to match any offer presented to the team.The Saving Agreement may indeed come into play if approved since attorney Mike Aguirre promised to file a lawsuit Thursday, the day after the original 60-day period, if the trigger period is extended.
| Discussion |
| Video |
Previous Stories:
- January 27, 2003: Chargers Have Until Wednesday To Use Contract Trigger
- January 16, 2003: Chargers New Stadium Plan Asks Taxpayers For $200M
- January 6, 2003: Ticket Guarantee Cost City $6.1 Million In 2002
- December 24, 2002: Task Force Recommends Chargers Contract Extension
- December 23, 2002: Task Force To Consider Extending Chargers' 'Escape' Period
- December 16, 2002: Chargers Will Extend Contract 'Trigger'
- December 11, 2002: City Council Vetoes Chargers' Lease Talks
- December 6, 2002: Sports Council Presents New Stadium Plan
- December 5, 2002: Chargers' Stadium Lease Talks Begin
- December 2, 2002: Mayor Doesn't Want Chargers Negotiating During Super Bowl
- November 22, 2002: City, Chargers Rhetoric Heats Up
- November 21, 2002: Ticket Guarantee Makes City Pay For Phantom Seats
- November 12, 2002: Lawyers: City Can Keep Chargers Without New Stadium
- October 31, 2002: City Won't Pay Chargers After Stadium Sign Snafu
- October 25, 2002: Report: Chargers Cannot Escape Contract
- October 22, 2002: City Wants Money Back From 'Sellout' Chargers Game
- October 1, 2002: City Spent $102,083 On Chargers-Patriots Game
- September 27, 2002: Chargers Task Force Scraps Denver Trip
- September 24, 2002: Councilman Troubled By Chargers Task Force
- September 18, 2002: Game Against Texans Cost Taxpayers $992,413
- August 21, 2002: Chargers-Seahawks Game Cost City $1.69M
- July 29, 2002: Ethics Code Approved For Chargers Task Force
- July 23, 2002: City Confirms Chargers Task Force
- July 12, 2002: Murphy Names Chargers Task Force Picks
- June 18, 2002: Task Force To Address Chargers Issue
- June 7, 2002: Mayor: City Faces 'Conundrum' Over Chargers
- June 5, 2002: City Asks LA Stadium Group Not To 'Interfere'
- June 4, 2002: Aguirre Says He Has Plan To Keep Chargers
- May 30, 2002: Aguirre: Recall Mayor Over Chargers Issue
- May 29, 2002: Chargers Get Call From LA Stadium Group
- May 28, 2002: Mayor Feels 'Obligation' To Keep Chargers
- May 24, 2002: Lawsuit Filed Against City Over Bolts Dealings
- May 16, 2002: LA Stadium Plans Revealed
- May 13, 2002: LA Officials: Stadium Not In Works
- May 9, 2002: Mayor Not Concerned By Chargers' Move North
- May 9, 2002: Chargers Move Training Camp North
Copyright 2007 by 10News.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.





