Related To Story |
Jurors Asked To Decide Between Manslaughter, Self Defense
POSTED: 9:35 pm PST January 28,
2009
EL CAJON, Calif. -- A Jamul contractor who fatally shot a young man in an SUV on a rural East County roadway made a "huge error in judgment," a prosecutor told jurors Wednesday, but a defense attorney said the man was acting reasonably in self-defense in the wake of a series of thefts from his property.Joseph Robert "Bob" Orlosky, 57, is charged with voluntary manslaughter, two counts of attempted voluntary manslaughter and shooting into an occupied vehicle in connection with the Dec. 1, 2006, shooting that took the life of Charles "Chuck" Crowe.Deputy District Attorney Jeff Dusek told the seven-woman, five-man jury that Orlosky made a "huge mistake" and a "huge error in judgment" when he fired on the Jeep Cherokee with an AR-15 rifle.
Crowe and the driver, David Hurley, were taking a third man, Hector Monget, home that night when they decided to drive up a dirt road off Skyline Truck Trail so they could check property sale signs and "get sideways" -- spinning out in the dirt, Dusek said.Upon returning from the end of the dirt road, they were confronted by the defendant, who unloaded at least 10 shots into their vehicle, Dusek said.Most hit the tires, but one shattered the rear window and struck the 23-year-old Crowe, a married father."Chuck Crowe was shot in the back of the head as they were driving for help," Dusek said. But defense attorney Paul Pfingst told jurors that his client, a heavy equipment contractor who stored the tools of his trade on his 163-acre property, had been plagued by a series of copper thefts in the months before the shooting.Two weeks before Crowe was killed, he detained at gunpoint three such thieves, who were eventually arrested by sheriff's deputies and later convicted, Pfingst said.The Sheriff's Department was aware that people were "stealing any copper that wasn't nailed down," Pfingst said.The lawyer said that the trial will cover about four to five seconds of the life of Orlosky, whom he described as a hard-working business owner and married father of four.With his birthday coming up and a deal about to be struck on producing from a mine near Yuma, Orlosky was certainly not planning on killing anyone, he said.Monget suffered a minor elbow wound in the shooting but Hurley was unhurt. There was no stolen copper or tools in their vehicle, Dusek said.Orlosky was originally charged with murder and attempted murder, but he was acquitted last year.The retrial is expected to last at least a month in the El Cajon courtroom of Judge Louis Hanoian.
Previous Stories:
- March 21, 2008: Man Acquitted In Fatal Shooting Faces Retrial
- March 4, 2008: Jamul Contractor Found Not Guilty In Fatal Shooting
- February 21, 2008: Contractor Claims Self-Defense In Man's Death
- February 9, 2007: East County Contractor To Stand Trial On Murder Charge
- December 18, 2006: Man Accused In Jamul Fatal Shooting Pleads Not Guilty
- December 8, 2006: Police: Man Identified In Unprovoked Jamul Shooting
Copyright 2009 by 10News.com. City Wire contributed to this report. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
The following are comments from our users. Opinions expressed are neither created nor endorsed by 10News.com. By posting your comments you agree to accept our Terms of Use. To report an offensive or otherwise inappropriate comment, click the "Flag" link that appears beneath that comment. Flagging a comment will send it to our editorial staff for review.









