DNA Expert: Danielle's Blood Found In RV
Westerfield Trial Focuses On DNA Evidence
POSTED: 6:17 pm PDT June 20,
2002
UPDATED: 10:29 am PDT June 21,
2002
SAN DIEGO -- Hair and blood found in David Westerfield's motor home and blood found on his jacket almost certainly belonged to Danielle van Dam, according to three DNA experts who testified in his kidnap and murder trial Thursday.
Much of the day's testimony was designed to teach the jury the basics of DNA and how crime laboratories study samples to make identification.
Watch LIVE Coverage Of Trial On Monday @ 9 a.m.
Lewis Maddux, laboratory director of Orchid Cellmark of Germantown, Md., said his firm received DNA from a blood stain on Westerfield's jacket."I conclude, with a reasonable degree of scientific certainty, that the DNA came from Danielle van Dam," Maddux said.He said the odds of another match were one in 57 quadrillion, equal to 57 plus 15 zeroes.
Catherine Theisen (pictured, right), who examines mitochondrial DNA at the FBI crime lab, said she and an assistant studied four hairs that the San Diego Police Department sent on Feb. 14.A hair found on a bathmat in the motor home "cannot be excluded from coming from Danielle van Dam," Theisen said.Mitochondrial DNA, Theisen explained, is carried down from the mother's side and is primarily used to study hair, bones and teeth.She said the sequence of DNA in the hair did not match any of 5,071 samples in the FBI database.Defense attorney Steven Feldman got Theisen to agree that only a few of the hairs sent to the FBI lab could be tested and, of those that were, most did not point to the 7-year-old."With the hairs represented to you as coming from the (defendant's) SUV, you excluded Danielle van Dam?" Feldman asked."Yes," Theisen said.Feldman drew a similar concession from forensic biologist Annette Lynn Peer, who not only studied the blood on the jacket, but also clippings from beneath Danielle van Dam's fingernails."David Westerfield is excluded from (the left fingernail)?" Feldman asked."That's correct," she answered."David Westerfield is excluded from the other hand?""That's correct."Among the many observations by police that led to Westerfield being a suspect, according to previous testimony, were scratch marks on his arm.
Peer (pictured, left) testified that she was able to obtain Danielle's DNA from a pair of her underwear found in her bedroom and later from a rib bone after the child's body was recovered Feb. 27 near Dehesa.She testified that DNA taken from a blood stain on the floor of Westerfield's motor home matched DNA taken from a blood stain on a green jacket belonging to the 50-year-old, twice-divorced father of two."They were the same," Peer testified."Were you able to calculate an estimate of how rare those matching profiles were between Danielle van Dam and the carpet stain, item 84?" prosecutor George "Woody" Clarke asked the DNA analyst."Yes, I was," Peer answered."With regard to the Caucasian population, what is the approximate likelihood of someone chosen at random from that population, having a set DNA genetic type that was found in both the carpet stain and Danielle van Dam?" Clarke asked Peer."That frequency would be -- in the Caucasian population -- approximately one in 130 quadrillion," she said.Peer said that during her initial search of the defendant's motor home on Feb. 6 she lifted a blood stain from some curtains near the driver's seat.She said a blood stain found on Westerfield's jacket was consistent with his DNA.
Earlier, police criminalist Sean Soriano (pictured, right) testified that he found four stains on the green and blue jacket, which Westerfield took to the dry cleaners Feb. 4.Three stains tested positive for the presumptive presence of blood, the criminalist testified. They were on the front right middle, the front right shoulder and the neck portion of the jacket, he said.The portions of the jacket where the stains were found were then cut out, packaged and sent to a lab for further DNA testing, Soriano said.He testified that he also found blood stains on a blanket and a bean-bag chair from the victim's room.The criminalist said he also removed two, long blond hairs from inside boxer shorts seized from the laundry room of Westerfield, who faces murder, kidnapping and misdemeanor possession of child pornography charges and could get the death penalty if convicted.Under cross-examination by Feldman, Soriano said he didn't find any semen on bedding seized from Westerfield's residence or motor home.
![]() WESTERFIELD TRIAL DANIELLE VAN DAM 1994-2002 E-mail: daniellevandam @yahoo.com Send mail to: P.O. Box 501515 San Diego, 92150 |
| Video |
Peer (pictured, left) testified that she was able to obtain Danielle's DNA from a pair of her underwear found in her bedroom and later from a rib bone after the child's body was recovered Feb. 27 near Dehesa.She testified that DNA taken from a blood stain on the floor of Westerfield's motor home matched DNA taken from a blood stain on a green jacket belonging to the 50-year-old, twice-divorced father of two."They were the same," Peer testified."Were you able to calculate an estimate of how rare those matching profiles were between Danielle van Dam and the carpet stain, item 84?" prosecutor George "Woody" Clarke asked the DNA analyst."Yes, I was," Peer answered."With regard to the Caucasian population, what is the approximate likelihood of someone chosen at random from that population, having a set DNA genetic type that was found in both the carpet stain and Danielle van Dam?" Clarke asked Peer."That frequency would be -- in the Caucasian population -- approximately one in 130 quadrillion," she said.Peer said that during her initial search of the defendant's motor home on Feb. 6 she lifted a blood stain from some curtains near the driver's seat.She said a blood stain found on Westerfield's jacket was consistent with his DNA.
Earlier, police criminalist Sean Soriano (pictured, right) testified that he found four stains on the green and blue jacket, which Westerfield took to the dry cleaners Feb. 4.Three stains tested positive for the presumptive presence of blood, the criminalist testified. They were on the front right middle, the front right shoulder and the neck portion of the jacket, he said.The portions of the jacket where the stains were found were then cut out, packaged and sent to a lab for further DNA testing, Soriano said.He testified that he also found blood stains on a blanket and a bean-bag chair from the victim's room.The criminalist said he also removed two, long blond hairs from inside boxer shorts seized from the laundry room of Westerfield, who faces murder, kidnapping and misdemeanor possession of child pornography charges and could get the death penalty if convicted.Under cross-examination by Feldman, Soriano said he didn't find any semen on bedding seized from Westerfield's residence or motor home. Previous Stories:
- June 20, 2002: DNA Expert: Danielle's Blood In Westerfield RV, Jacket
- June 20, 2002: Specialist: Danielle's Prints In Westerfield Motor Home
- June 19, 2002: Laundry, Videotapes, Lubricant Seized From Westerfield Home
- June 19, 2002: Trial Focuses On Evidence Collected By Police
- June 18, 2002: Forensics Specialist Collected Hairs, Necklace
- June 18, 2002: Dry Cleaners: Westerfield Distant, Rushed
- June 14, 2002: Judge Tries To Inject Levity Into Westerfield Trial
- June 14, 2002: Park Rangers: Westerfield Overpaid, Shows Wallet
- June 12, 2002: Westerfield Interview Heard; Neighbor Says Blinds Shut
- June 12, 2002: Westerfield Trial: KGTV Reporter Takes Stand
- June 11, 2002: Van Dam Friends Take Stand; Westerfield 'Creepy'
- June 7, 2002: Westerfield Trial Focuses On Van Dam Lifestyle
- June 6, 2002: Day 3: Brenda Van Dam, Dad's Bar
- June 6, 2002: Brenda Van Dam Testifies In Westerfield Trial
- June 6, 2002: Day 2: Damon Van Dam, Autopsy Photos
- June 5, 2002: Damon Van Dam Takes Witness Stand
- June 5, 2002: Cases Outlined In Westerfield Trial
- June 4, 2002: Westerfield Trial Starts; Witnesses Take Stand
- June 3, 2002: Westerfield Trial Set To Get Under Way
- May 31, 2002: Westerfield Trial Jury Selection Complete
- May 31, 2002: Westerfield Trial Scheduled To Start Tuesday
- May 30, 2002: Jury Selection In Westerfield Trial Enters Third Day
- May 28, 2002: Jury Selection Continues In Westerfield Trial
- May 20, 2002: Experts Question Speed Of Westerfield Trial
- May 17, 2002: Court To Interview 262 Potential Jurors
- May 17, 2002: Westerfield Jury Selection Under Way
- May 16, 2002: Westerfield Jury Selection Set To Begin
- May 16, 2002: Westerfield Trial Jury Questionnaire
- May 15, 2002: Judge May Make Rulings In Westerfield Case
- May 13, 2002: Westerfield Pre-Trial Still Closed
- May 10, 2002: Westerfield Trial: Pretrial Motions Remain Closed
- May 8, 2002: Reporters Called In Westerfield Trial
- May 8, 2002: DA: Danielle Was Suffocated By Westerfield
- May 7, 2002: Pretrial Motions Start In Westerfield Case
- May 2, 2002: Westerfield Pretrial Motions To Remain Sealed
- May 1, 2002: Court: Westerfield Affidavits To Remain Sealed
- April 25, 2002: DA To Seek Death Penalty Against Westerfield
- April 19, 2002: Westerfield Given Limited Access To Police Records
- April 18, 2002: Press Kept Out Of Van Dam Murder Case
- April 18, 2002: Judge Reviews Cops' Files In Van Dam Murder Case
- April 17, 2002: Westerfield Fights To Keep Search Warrants Sealed
- April 15, 2002: DA: Deny Westerfield Access To Police Records
- April 12, 2002: Lie-Detector Specialist: Westerfield 'Deceptive'
- April 11, 2002: Documents: Dogs Alerted Police To Westerfield
- April 11, 2002: No Live Press For Westerfield Pretrial Hearings
- April 4, 2002: Westerfield Lawyer: Client Abused By Police
- March 28, 2002: Trial Date Set For Van Dam Murder Case
- March 28, 2002: Westerfield To Make Court Appearance
- March 15, 2002: Westerfield To Stand Trial In Van Dam Murder
- March 13, 2002: Westerfield Hearing Takes A Break
- March 12, 2002: Testimony: Police Find Porn On Westerfield's Computer
- March 11, 2002: Witness: Danielle's Body Found Nude, Decomposing
- March 8, 2002: Gag Order Issued In Van Dam Murder Case
- March 7, 2002: Police Acted Inappropriately Toward Westerfield
- March 4, 2002: Westerfield Affidavits To Remain Sealed
- February 27, 2002: Search Warrants Show Police Sought Child Porn
- February 27, 2002: Danielle's Parents Respond To Neighbor's Arraignment
- February 26, 2002: Van Dam Neighbor To Be Arraigned
- February 26, 2002: Westerfield To Be Charged With Murder
- February 25, 2002: Danielle's Blood Found On Neighbor's Clothing
- February 14, 2002: Police Search Neighbor's House Again
- February 8, 2002: Police: Westerfield Had Child Porn
- February 8, 2002: Investigation Operations Base Leaves North County
- February 8, 2002: Search For Danielle Goes Nationwide
- February 5, 2002: Police Question Neighbor In Missing Girl Case
Copyright 2007 by 10News.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.











